Skip to main content
All CollectionsFoundation
Addressing Vertical Cuts in Foundation Compression Zones: Options for Stability
Addressing Vertical Cuts in Foundation Compression Zones: Options for Stability
N
Written by Nathan Toothman
Updated over 3 months ago

Vertical cuts in foundation compression zones can pose a serious risk to the stability of a structure, especially during seismic events or heavy rain. These cuts create unsupported soil faces that can collapse, potentially undermining the foundation and compromising the entire structure. Recognizing this risk is essential, and homeowners have two main options for addressing the issue: adding retaining walls or lowering the footers. Below, we’ll explore these options and considerations for choosing the most effective solution.

Why Vertical Cuts in the Compression Zone Are a Concern

The compression zone of a foundation refers to the area where soil supports the weight and load of the structure. Vertical cuts in this zone remove the natural support soil provides, leaving the soil exposed and vulnerable to collapse. Without adequate support, the soil around these cuts can shift or erode, leading to settlement or instability in the foundation. In seismic zones, the risk is even higher, as the cuts are more likely to collapse or shift due to ground movement.

Solution Options

1. Option 1: Add Retaining Walls to Support the Vertical Cut

Adding retaining walls is a practical and effective way to stabilize vertical cuts in foundation areas. Retaining walls support the exposed soil, preventing it from collapsing or eroding over time. These walls can be designed to withstand seismic loads as well, providing additional stability during earthquakes. The cost of installing retaining walls typically ranges from $500 to $1,000 per linear foot, depending on materials and site conditions. This solution is relatively straightforward, and it’s a common choice for addressing unsupported vertical cuts, especially in areas with moderate soil movement.

2. Option 2: Lower the Footers

Another option is to lower the footers, essentially extending the foundation deeper into stable soil layers. This approach requires excavating and modifying the existing foundation footers to achieve greater depth. Lowering the footers increases foundation stability by anchoring the structure more securely in undisturbed soil. While this option is highly effective, it is more labor-intensive and typically more costly, with an approximate cost of around $2,000 per footer. This cost may vary depending on the number of footers and site-specific conditions.

Lowering footers is often preferred in high-risk areas or situations where soil conditions are especially poor, as it provides a long-term solution with minimal maintenance requirements.

Which Option to Choose?

In most cases, Option 1: Adding Retaining Walls is sufficient and preferred by homeowners due to its balance of effectiveness and cost-efficiency. Retaining walls provide solid support for the vertical cut without requiring extensive excavation or alterations to the foundation. This approach is also easier to adjust or modify if future needs arise.

In situations where soil conditions are particularly unstable or the risk of seismic activity is high, Option 2: Lowering the Footers may be the better choice. Although more costly, lowering the footers provides an added level of stability, anchoring the structure in deeper, more stable soil layers.

Final Recommendation

Choosing the right option ultimately depends on the site’s specific conditions and budgetary constraints. For many homeowners, adding retaining walls is a reliable and cost-effective solution, while lowering footers may be warranted for high-risk areas or more significant stability concerns. Consulting with a foundation expert or engineer can help assess the site’s conditions and provide tailored recommendations to ensure long-term stability and safety.

Did this answer your question?